Jumat, 29 Oktober 2010

3rd article ,,

IELL 2 ,,

· Title article : The right to build mosques and churches

· Author : Al Makin, Yogyakarta

· Source :

Retrieved from : http://www.thejakartapost.com/paper

On October 25th 2010

The Right to Build Mosques and Churches

Al Makin, Yogyakarta | Fri, 10/15/2010 9:31 AM | Opinion

Mosques and churches, in which believers pray to God for a happy life in this world and salvation in the world to come, can also cause tension and conflict. In this archipelagic country — with a boast-worthy diversity of ethnicities, faiths, ideologies, political parties and social organizations — mosques and churches of minority groups are under attack.

Ahmadiyah’s mosques and the churches of the Batak Protestant Church (HKBP) in Bekasi are cases in point. Ironically, those who attacked those places of worship, such as the FPI (Islam Defenders Front), also pompously voiced their disagreement in public statements. They question the rights of minorities to build places of worship that they perceive as a threat to their mosques.

Worse still, the government, e.g., the religious affairs minister, makes that disagreement its main concern and shields the mosques of the majority — which are in fact “safe and sound” as nobody dares to disturb them.

The mosques and churches belonging to minority groups are then further discredited, while some of the perpetrators are roaming free and looking for vulnerable people who can be turned into radicals. Through the public media, schools and mosques, the younger generation can become the prey of radicals.

True, some, such as Abu Bakar Ba’asyir and those who stabbed the HKBP leaders, were jailed for their roles in spreading hate, causing disorder and breaking the law. However, their ideologies are far from diminishing in this country.

Nevertheless, you may wonder why the “majority” is so scared of the “minority”. Common sense and logic are turned upside down. Who is intimidating whom? Who are the perpetrators and who are the victims? The minority or the majority? Which one is increasing? Mosques or churches? Ahmadiyah’s mosques or the Muslim majority’s mosques?

Throughout history, the diversity of this country has been palpable. Evidence can be seen in the remaining sanctuaries in Indonesia, Hindu and Buddhist temples scattered throughout many cities. Most of these places of worship — such as many of the old churches in Europe that attract tourists with their photo-ready exotic sculptures — no longer function.

Certainly, Hindu and Buddhist temples were built much earlier than mosques and churches, where believers are still coming to listen to preachers’ words.

What is also obvious is that the number of majority Sunni Muslim mosques is noticeably increasing. In 1997 the Religious Affairs Ministry recorded 392,044 mosques. In 2004 the number was 643,834. Now the number has likely doubled or tripled.

“Nevertheless, you may wonder why the ‘majority’ is so scared of the ‘minority’. ”

The increase in the number of mosques can be felt whenever you visit an Indonesian city — provincial, district, or subdistrict — you will find a new mosque with a shiny dome.

Mosques dominate many cities’ landscapes. In front of the Prambanan temples in Yogyakarta a mosque stands mightily. In the heart of Pekalongan, Central Java, a large mosque was built in front of an old church. Mosques are also found in malls, schools and other public places. Remember that before the 1990s, mosques were not as numerous as they are now.

Yet there is no evidence to suggest there is significant growth in the number of mosques belonging to minority groups, e.g. Shiite, Ahmadiyah, Tarekat and other Muslim minorities.

Nor is there a significant rise in the number of churches in Indonesia, such as those of Roman Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox, and others.

Why are many so anxious about the construction of places of worship other than their own? Clearly the idea that there is an increase in faiths other than Sunni and rising missionary activities is mythical.

Many scholarly studies have shown this. However, the anxiety and the spread of the myth are not fairytales. They are real.

Keep in mind that the Sunni majority can build a mosque anywhere they choose, any time they want, in any form they desire and without special permission from any authority or the government, even though minority groups are required to obtain permission before building their places of worship. The number of mosques and churches demonstrates this.

The writer is the author of Representing the Enemy, Musaylima in Muslim Literature.

By : Fransiska Indah Kristiani

(2010110012)

Math Departement

Summary of the article :

This article is about the unfairness of the cultural and religious diversity, which is an archipelagic country, especially in Indonesia. In this article, the author calls them, that the use of mosques as "majority", and most of those who use the Church, temple or shrine as "minority ".

As a "majority" they question the rights of "minorities" to build places of worship which they regard as a threat to their mosque. Worse still, the government, e.g., the religious affairs minister, makes that disagreement its main concern and shields the mosques of the majority — which are in fact “safe and sound” as nobody dares to disturb them.

Throughout history, the diversity of this country has been palpable. Evidence can be seen in the remaining sanctuaries in Indonesia, Hindu and Buddhist temples scattered throughout many cities. Most of these places of worship — such as many of the old churches in Europe that attract tourists with their photo-ready exotic sculptures — no longer function. Certainly, Hindu and Buddhist temples were built much earlier than mosques and churches.

Now the number has likely doubled or tripled. Nevertheless, you may wonder why the “majority” is so scared of the “minority”.

In front of the Prambanan temples in Yogyakarta a mosque stands mightily. In the heart of Pekalongan, Central Java, a large mosque was built in front of an old church. Mosques are also found in malls, schools and other public places. Remember that before the 1990s, mosques were not as numerous as they are now.

“Majority” can build a mosque anywhere they choose, any time they want, in any form they desire and without special permission from any authority or the government, even though “minority” groups are REQUIRED to obtain permission before building their places of worship.

Comment :

I think the article is discussing something very sensitive. This article also discusses, in accordance with what is happening in Indonesia. With Islam as the State religion of the majority and a minority. Most actually sometimes feel that threats to the rights of minorities, to build the temples.

And sometimes we wonder why most are so afraid of minorities. Common sense and logic upside down. Who is intimidating whom? Who are the perpetrators and victims? Minority or majority? Which is increased? Mosques or churches?

But in fact the current amount of the mosque may have doubled or tripled from the year 2004 with the number 643 834.

The majority feel threatened will be a growing minority, but there is no evidence to suggest there is significant growth in the number of mosques belong to minority groups, such as Shiites, Ahmadiyya, Sufi and other Muslim minorities. There is also no significant increase in the number of churches in Indonesia, as a Roman Catholic, Protestant, Eastern Orthodox, and others.

For them, the majority, to build a mosque anywhere they choose, any time they want, in whatever form they want and without special permission from local authorities or government, although minority groups are required to obtain permission before they build places of worship . This is what sometimes becomes injustice.

And in fact, all of them can live side by side in full of peace, with mutual respect and appreciate in all such differences.

By : Fransiska Indah Kristiani

(2010110012)

Math Departement

Kamis, 21 Oktober 2010

2nd article ,

IELL 2 ,,

· Title article : Upholding our children’s right to education

· Author : Frans H. Winarta, Jakarta

· Source

Retrieved from : http://www.thejakartapost.com/paper

On October 18th 2010

Upholding our children’s right to education

Frans H. Winarta, Jakarta | Tue, 10/19/2010 9:48 AM | Opinion

People were shocked by a recent report on a five-day halt of activities at the North Jakarta International School (NJIS) from Sept. 27 till Oct. 1 due to a dispute between the school and property developer PT Summarecon Agung over a rented plot of land. The temporary closure was taken in response to three warning letters previously issued by Summarecon after NJIS could not reach an agreement with the developer over the school’s desired purchase of the plot that it has been renting for 20 years, despite two years of negotiation.

Let’s not discuss the dispute. We should pay more attention to the disruption of school activities at NJIS — particularly its impact on students, who suffered not only from financial losses due to already paid school tuition, but also from a violation of their right to education as guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution.

The right of every Indonesian to education is also guaranteed in Article 12 of the Law on Human Rights and also in articles 9 and 49 of the Law on Child Protection. Internationally, such a right is guaranteed by Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

Besides neglecting their right to education, the dispute could have traumatized NJIS students who saw their school surrounded by security guards. A banner displayed in the school compound saying the school’s lease had expired also gave the impression of a frightening situation there.

Schools are formal institutions that are significant for children’s education. Schools are where children follow curriculums and exchange thoughts with teachers and fellow students so that the level of their intelligence can improve. At school, children not only develop knowledge and formal education but also the ability to communicate, interact and adapt to the school’s environment. The dispute and the temporary halt of school activities will certainly inhibit the development of NJIS students and therefore neglect their human rights.

The case against the NJIS students is a human rights test for President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s administration. The government needs to act immediately. If this is allowed to go on it will ruin the image of human rights in Indonesia. Moreover, considering that some NJIS students are children of diplomats from friendly countries, this incident may become a topic for discussion in their respective countries. It might create an image of Indonesia as a place that does not protect or respect human rights, especially the right to education. In the long run, it will decrease in foreign investors’ trust and could inhibit the recovery of Indonesia’s economy from a prolonged crisis.

The moral of the story is that the children’s right to education cannot be restricted, reduced, withdrawn or eliminated by anyone, including commercial interests. Commercial interests must give way to reforms in our education system, which have been left behind by other nations. Without tough, educated and qualified human resources, it will be difficult for us to compete with other nations.

The state, therefore, must intervene to maintain order so the NJIS students can study in peace. The police must ensure the continuity of school activities at NJIS. At the same time, humane settlement of the land dispute must be pursued so as to bring normalcy back to the school and ensure the students get their constitutional rights to education.


The writer is a lecturer at Pelita Harapan University’s law school and member of the governing board of the National Law Commission.

By : Fransiska Indah Kristiani

(2010110012)

Math Departement

Summary of the article :

In this article, the author discusses human rights on specified on education. Discussing education not only about the structure of school buildings, but also their right to education as guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution, as well as their psychological.

Education is discussed in this article refer to the school. Where, In school, children not only develop their knowledge and formal education, but also the ability to communicate, interact and adapt to school environment.

The author also connects the human rights discussed with Indonesia's image as a place that does not protect or respect for human rights, especially the right to education. This is because some students NJIS are children of diplomats from friendly countries, so that this incident could become a topic for discussion in their respective countries.

The author also discusses the state should intervene more and more serious to deal with this incident, so they can return to school and ensure students get their constitutional rights to education.

Comment :

I think this article is quite good, because really talking about things that happened in the world of education in Indonesia today, especially regarding the rights they are supposed to get. But unfortunately, in this article the author only fixated on the events that occurred in NJIS, at least to discuss the education of disadvantaged children or children who are less fortunate.

I agree on a few quotes in this article, such as "In school, children not only develop their knowledge and formal education, but also the ability to communicate, interact and adapt to school environment.". Because at school, children not only gain knowledge and formal education, but also get or learn about socializing with friends and surroundings.

"... Creating the image of Indonesia as a place that does not protect or respect for human rights, especially the right to education.", The image of Indonesia which is discussed in this article are more devoted to the right to education.

Moral of this story is that the right of children to education can not be restricted, reduced, withdrawn or eliminated by anyone, including commercial interests. commercial interests must give way to reforms in our educational system, which had been abandoned by other nations. Without a strong human resources, educated and qualified, it would be difficult for us to compete with other nations.

By : Fransiska Indah Kristiani

(2010110012)

Math Departement

Kamis, 14 Oktober 2010

1st article ,,

IELL 2 ,,

· Title article : Doubt and Why Good People Do Bad Things

· Author : Jennie S. Bev, San Francisco

· Source

Retrieved from : http://www.thejakartapost.com/paper

On October 11th 2010

Doubt and why good people do bad things

Jennie S. Bev, San Francisco | Thu, 09/23/2010 10:32 AM | Opinion

Indonesia is renowned for its kind, smiling and warm-hearted people, beautiful culture, strong values, high morality and for being very religious.

By the same token, Indonesia is also enigmatic, mind-boggling and paradoxical.

Minorities have been persecuted. “Heretical” Islamic sects have been condemned, destructed and banned. Churches have been burnt, closed and destroyed. Genocide has occurred in Papua causing tens of thousands of deaths.

Porn has been banned and ministers have been judging morality based on people’s wardrobes. All kinds of corruption have remained rampant beyond belief.

President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono is a soft-spoken, cultured and highly educated individual with a PhD in Agriculture. During his election campaign he vowed to eradicate corruption from its roots.

Judging from his background and calm disposition, he could have been my kind of president.

SBY condemned Terry Jones’ Koran-burning plan, but did not stop the destruction of churches in his own country. He did not follow up with his anticorruption vow, allowing corrupt officials to run free unpunished or punished minimally. Interestingly, he has preferred to sing and write songs, smiling like an Indonesian Idol contestant.

It is perplexing: How come an individual or group of individuals be so great and yet do so many inconceivably bad things? Why do they allow injustices and unfairness to continue? What can we do about it?

I did not have the answers to all these questions, but I do have a part of the answer. After all, we need to understand the hidden truths and to acknowledge the bitter realities so we can use them as a “diagnosis” to find the “cure”.

Carl Jung, the founder of the Jungian branch of psychology, posited that “One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious”. Using the Depth Psychology technique, Jung shed light on individuals and groups that were inherently good but had done bad things.

Jungian theory is based upon the notion that hidden subconscious meanings are projected through ego consciousness.

Historic programming is known to be cultivated in the unconscious mind, which can result in hubris and strong preconceived notions such as prejudices and stereotyping behaviors.

According to Jung, fundamentalism in all forms is compounded of both. In a society, collective contagion creates group madness, which is folie à deux.

With seductive ideologies, group ecstasy brings hidden devilish qualities to the surface.

Throughout history, many incidents have shown how good people have been at doing bad things.

Prior to 1537 when Pope Paul III declared that Indians had human souls, they were considered beasts, thus it was legitimate to hunt them. Experiments by Stanley Milgram at Yale in 1960s showed that more than 60 percent of respondents did not blink an eye when they were asked to torture a subject, under
the belief that it was done for the greater good in the name of scientific research.

This experiment explained why Nazi soldiers, who had the capacity to fall in love, did what they did in the Holocaust.

It also explained why people under the influence of seductive ideology or other forms of seduction (like those carrying out corrupt acts) can ignore the well-being of others and disregard their own “good-natured” disposition.

It may also explain why a certain president condemns violations in a faraway country but “approves” (by silence) the persecution and genocide against his own people.

On religious fundamentalism, it is interesting to note that this phenomenon largely occurs in monotheistic religions. Using the same theoretical framework, such occurrences are believed to have stemmed from the rigid structure of salvation, which is manicheistic (dualistic) in nature: either heaven or earth, either saved for eternity or face eternal damnation.

Eastern religions, such as Hinduism and Buddhism, are more “flexible” due to less dogmatic approach, recognizing the “second chances” in reincarnation.

The formation of monotheistic fundamentalism is brought about by the repression of worries and anxieties. In individuals, one’s denials and “bad” behaviors are also the result of repressed thoughts and imprinted historic programming.

Ego always attempts to cloak the repressed unconscious mind, which from time to time emerges as things that are in direct opposition to an individual’s or group’s conscious beliefs.

Repressed elements are the culprit of “bad” beliefs, actions and behaviors.

Understanding the root causes of why good people do bad things is crucial to acknowledging the existence of problems.

Only through acknowledging can the healing process begin, assuming peaceful non-violent and non-killing acts follow in peace-building efforts.

The role of “doubt” is the key. Healthy skepticism allows consciousness to materialize. James Hollis PhD in Why Good People Do Bad Things: Understanding Our Darker Selves reminds us that hubris and historic programming can bring down an individual and a group of people.

We must learn to be aware of where our acts come from and start acting out mindfully based on principles of compassion, non-violence and non-killing.

This is a hard task, but it must be done or Indonesia will become a country run by egoistical individuals who fantasize about nobility but are actually smothered in blood and tears.

The writer (jenniesbev.com) is an author and columnist based in Northern California.

By : Fransiska Indah Kristiani

(2010110012)

Math Departement

Summary of the article :

This article tells the authors opinion about the performance of President Yudhoyono, who at first he was proud as president. author discusses the campaign promises that eventually some limited promise. As no follow through with the promise of anti-corruption, which allowed corrupt officials to run free without any punishment or at least punished.

In addition this article also discusses the kind, smiling and warm-hearted people, beautiful culture, strong values, high morality and for being very religious, and tolerance as a sign of how the Indonesian people, who have started somewhat reduced. As churches have been burned, was closed and dismantled.

The author discusses the sensitivity of SBY against his own country. As Yudhoyono has condemned the plan of burning the Quran Terry Jones, but did not stop the destruction of the church in his own country. He did not follow through with the promise of anti-corruption, which allowed corrupt officials to run free without any punishment or at least punished.SimBaca secara fonetik

Comment :

I think this article in accordance with reality. I also agree with this article. in terms of several performance SBY which ultimately only be a mere promise. Because according to the reality until now there are many corrupt people running free without any punishment or at least punished.

Similarly, about less kind, smiling and warm-hearted people, beautiful culture, strong values, high morality and for being very religious, and tolerance, I also agree. This can be caused by several factors, such as the environment, patterns of thought, faith and globalization factors.

We must learn to realize where our actions come from and began to act out mindful of the principle of compassion, non-violence and non-killing. This is a difficult task, but to do or Indonesia will be a country run by selfish individuals who fantasize about the noble but actually drink blood and tears


By : Fransiska Indah Kristiani

(2010110012)

Math Departement